Skip to main content
This very sad story posted yesterday in the UK's Independant:
They came from across China to protest under the watchful gaze of the police, brandishing handmade placards with pictures of their missing children. In a sign of growing discontent, the parents' rare demonstration in the centre of Beijing was aimed at pressuring the authorities to do more to investigate the cases of tens of thousands of children snatched and sold every year.
Although the story notes that many of the children stolen in China are not sold to westerners, but to Chinese seeking boys or to brothels seeking girls for prostitution, it is still worthy of noting that

But the US State Department's trafficking report for 2010 said that despite significant efforts, the government did not comply with the "minimum standards" for eliminating trafficking. It said there were continued reports of children being forced into prostitution.

China does not give figures, but an estimate based on reports for a British television documentary suggested that up to 70,000 children were snatched from the streets every year in China.

Seventy-thousand children. I hope that estimate is high, but even at a quarter of that number, it is far too many children. I have to wonder how much of the demand for thee Chinese children comes from westerners seeking to build their "forever families" through international adoption. If we stopped the practice of purchasing children from adoption agencies and stopped pretending that a purchased child's identity and heritage could be changes by governmental fiat or court decree, how much of this child snatching industry in China, and other countries, would stop? How many of these children would still be with their families if American adopters stopped believing that the life they offer to an adopted child is superior to the life they would otherwise have in their native country?

There are legitimate times when a child needs to be raised by someone other than his or her natural parents, but these times are far more rare than the adoption industry would have you believe, and there are alternatives to their care that do not involve selling them on the open market.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Agregate Demand and the US Savings Rate

In my last post, I touched on the differences between the economic theories of John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises. Immediately aftward, I was directed to this story in the New York Times. It seems that americans are saving more instead of spending the their money on consumer goods. Up until this downturn, about 70% of the US Economy was consumer spending, and in 2005, the US Savings rate was negative 2.7%. The "stimulus" is supposed to stimulate spending to get money moving again. But it isn't happening as planned. Folks are saving for down payments because they don't expect to get zero down home mortgages; they're saving to replenish their decimated retirement and college funds. The austrians believe that the best way to "fix" the economy is to allow the "malinvestment" created by the false signals in the economy (from the open market ops and deficit spending) to be liquidated and the resources repurposed into better investments. It...
Post a Comment
Read more

Adoption Bibliography

Eventually, I will post the rest of my paper, but I think it appropriate to post the Bibliography, and I have some use for having it available online. This represents only the sources used in my paper, not the full extent of sources considered. “Adoption is the Best Option” http://adoptionisthebestoption.yolasite.com/ (a really good example of misleading appeals to emotion.) Alternate Religions Educational Network. Alternate Religions Educational Network (AREN) http://www.aren.org/ . accessed Nov 26, 2009. Babb, L. Anne. Ethics In American Adoption. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey 1999. Baptist Children’s Home and Family Services (BCHFS) http://www.bchfs.com . Accessed Sept 9, 2009. Barrett, William P. “Americas Most (and least) Efficient Charities.” Forbes Nov 2004 Bender, Karen E., & Nina de Gramont, eds.. Choice: True Stories of Birth, Contraception, Infertility, Adoption, Single Parenthood, & Adoption. San Francisco, CA: MacAdam-Cage 2007 Berne, Emma Carlso...
3 comments
Read more

Calling Evil Good and Good Evil: LDS Policy on Unwed Pregnancies

The opinion piece below was written for publication in the Salt Lake Tribune concurrent with the LDS Church's October General Conference. The Trib couldn't fit it in, so it is published here. My vote in the sustaining was communicated to both the First Presidency and my local ward Bishop separately. This weekend, members of the LDS Church will gather in their great and spacious building on North Temple for their semi-annual General Conference. During one of the sessions, members will be asked to raise their hands in sustaining votes for church leaders. I will not be in attendance, so I will use this article as a means of casting my vote in the negative for all of the Church’s General Authorities who promote and support the church’s policy of “encouraging” all unwed mothers to relinquish their babies for adoption. This encouragement comes in the form of extreme pressure from church leaders and devout family and friends. This policy, which the church stops short of saying is...
3 comments
Read more