Skip to main content

The Recession is Officially Over (???)


One of today's lead news stories reports that the NBER has determined that the "longest recession since the Great Depression" ended in June of 2009, after a "record" four consistent quarters of negative GDP growth.

That news, besides being a year untimely, would be great if it were true. Well, okay, it is true if you use the NBER and government definitions of economic data. The problem is that the data is skewed and just a bit unreliable.

First, the calculations of GDP are corrected for "inflation" by using the Consumer Price Index as the correction factor. The CPI was "tweaked" by Alan Greenspan back in the 1980's and doesn't measure the same fixed market basket of goods that was used previously, and makes allowances for people switching to alternatives if the price of one commodity increases. According to John William of Shadow Government Statistics (ShadowStats), who publishes comparisons between current practices and prior practice, the CPI reports about 3% lower than it did pre-Greenspan. As a result, the correction for inflation used to determine if the economy is growing or shrinking is off by about 3% too. The graph above shows the difference in the GDP as calculated by ShadowStats and the "official" version. When the line is below 0%, the economy is shrinking, and we're in a recession. By Williams' numbers, we've been in a recession since 2004, and we are still below the line.

2004 to 2010+ is about 24 consecutive quarters, give or take, or 60 months; 48 to be conservative. The longest "recession" during the Great Depression was only 43 months.

The second problem is that GDP, the principal measure of recessions, is based on government spending. The actual formula is GDP = C + I + G + (E - I) where C is consumer spending, I is gross investment, G is government spending, E is exports and I in imports. Keynesian economics calls for government intervention, either through monetary policy (lower Fed interest rates) or fiscal policy (government spending) during recessions. The theory is that increasing the supply of money will "stimulate" the economy and produce growth. The problem is that the spending itself is then counted as part of the growth. The C, I, and (E - I) sectors could still be shrinking, but the GDP is being propped up by the massive G. And the massive G is being funded by a huge deficit as the government takes on more and more debt to sustain the spending.

Even increases in C, I and E that occur when the government is spending through deficits, is artificial growth. As we saw when the home purchase subsidy and the cash for clunkers programs ended the "stimulus" ended with them.

And the spending, by putting more money (cash and cash substitutes) into the economy causes inflation, it just doesn't show up immediately in the CPI. The question that remains is whether the infusion of money will result in inflation or the high credit default rate will result in deflation first.

That, and there's a big question about whether the tax increases necessary to pay off the debt will go down well with the voters.

(Chart courtesy of Shadow Government Statistics.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Agregate Demand and the US Savings Rate

In my last post, I touched on the differences between the economic theories of John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises. Immediately aftward, I was directed to this story in the New York Times. It seems that americans are saving more instead of spending the their money on consumer goods. Up until this downturn, about 70% of the US Economy was consumer spending, and in 2005, the US Savings rate was negative 2.7%. The "stimulus" is supposed to stimulate spending to get money moving again. But it isn't happening as planned. Folks are saving for down payments because they don't expect to get zero down home mortgages; they're saving to replenish their decimated retirement and college funds. The austrians believe that the best way to "fix" the economy is to allow the "malinvestment" created by the false signals in the economy (from the open market ops and deficit spending) to be liquidated and the resources repurposed into better investments. It...

Adoption Bibliography

Eventually, I will post the rest of my paper, but I think it appropriate to post the Bibliography, and I have some use for having it available online. This represents only the sources used in my paper, not the full extent of sources considered. “Adoption is the Best Option” http://adoptionisthebestoption.yolasite.com/ (a really good example of misleading appeals to emotion.) Alternate Religions Educational Network. Alternate Religions Educational Network (AREN) http://www.aren.org/ . accessed Nov 26, 2009. Babb, L. Anne. Ethics In American Adoption. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey 1999. Baptist Children’s Home and Family Services (BCHFS) http://www.bchfs.com . Accessed Sept 9, 2009. Barrett, William P. “Americas Most (and least) Efficient Charities.” Forbes Nov 2004 Bender, Karen E., & Nina de Gramont, eds.. Choice: True Stories of Birth, Contraception, Infertility, Adoption, Single Parenthood, & Adoption. San Francisco, CA: MacAdam-Cage 2007 Berne, Emma Carlso...

Once in an eclipsed blue moon with Mercury in retrograde, etc

For any of you that may be interested in astrology or astronomy, this is quite the New Years... Today at 12:13 pm Mountain Standard Time, the moon was at it's fullest, and all the way around the world in the darkness of night, it was eclipsed over much of Europe, Africa and Asia. Of course, today is also New Year's Eve, and the occurrence of a full moon on New Year's Eve hasn't happened since 1990. According to Spaceweather.com , an eclipsed Blue Moon on New Year's happens only once every 91 years! So this is truly a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence! So to recap, we have Mercury (and Mars) in Retrograde right now, adding to the energies of the Full Moon, which is falling on the global holiday of New Year's Eve, which is wrapping up the '00 decade, and then all of those factors are being amplified by the power of an extremely rare eclipse. Wow! We know that Mercury is Retrograde in Capricorn, and this full moon is in its natural home of Cancer. The sign of Can...