Skip to main content

Keynes vs. Mises -- Whose Theory Will Rule

When I was in high school I was one of those geeky - nerdy kids. This was the late 1970's and calculators were just coming on the market, so I had a Texas Instruments SR-50A in a pouch on my belt and a slide-rule in my shirt pocket. If the PC had existed back then, I would have been a prototypical computer geek. One of my favorite classes was Vocational Electronics.

One day during my Junior year the instructor gave us a lab assignment involving resonant circuits. We were to build a tank circuit with an inductor and a capacitor in parallel, calculate the frequency the circuit should resonate at, then measure the voltage across the circuit as we varied the frequency to see if the formula actually worked.

There were two of us working on the lab. I finished the lab quickly; Mike, well, not so quickly. While I waited for him to finish the assignment, I started experimenting with values of capacitor outside the range from the assignment. As I got farther and farther and farther away from the values in the design of the assignment, the more error there was in the formula. Eventually, the error was so large I had to conclude that the formula didn't work.

As I've gone through the last 30 or so years, I've found many other things that work well with "normal" values, but when those values are pushed to the extremes, the rules don't work. What is true in the middle just isn't true at the periphery.

That is the nature of science... to push the values to the extremes and see where the theory breaks down, where the rules don't work any more, where the "truth" isn't so true any more. Then science's task is to figure out why the rules don't work anymore.

I told this story to set up a point about the current economic situation and the Obama administration's attempts to fix it. The plans to fix the economy are based on a theory by John Maynard Keynes that became popular in the 1940's. Keynes theorized that recessions and depressions are caused by a decline in "agregate demand" and that by pumping money into the economy that demand could be stimulated.

For the last 70 years, every time the economy has started to contract, the Federal Reserve has lowered interest rates and the government has increased spending. Keynes' theory seems to work, but this contraction has some different features to it. Interest rates were already low, and are now essentially zero, the deficit is higher than ever before. Will the Keynesian bailout/stimulus work?

It doesn't get a lot press, but there is another theory, proposed by the austrian economist Ludwig von Mises in 1924 that says both the boom (bubble) and the bust are caused by intervention by the government. Under this theory, the Fed's open market operations and the government's deficit spending send false signals in the economy, which cause faulty investments that appear as a bubble, then collapse when the banks, etc., realize that the resourses aren't really there. If this theory is correct, then the government has been building a large bubble (and patching the sides of it when it has tried to collapse) since the great depression. Evenutally, the bubble will become so large that lowering interest rates will no longer "stimulate" and deficit spending will only cause the value of the dollar to tank and massive price inflation.

So, are we in that area where the rules don't work anymore for Lord Keynes theory? We'll have to wait and see.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Agregate Demand and the US Savings Rate

In my last post, I touched on the differences between the economic theories of John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises. Immediately aftward, I was directed to this story in the New York Times. It seems that americans are saving more instead of spending the their money on consumer goods. Up until this downturn, about 70% of the US Economy was consumer spending, and in 2005, the US Savings rate was negative 2.7%. The "stimulus" is supposed to stimulate spending to get money moving again. But it isn't happening as planned. Folks are saving for down payments because they don't expect to get zero down home mortgages; they're saving to replenish their decimated retirement and college funds. The austrians believe that the best way to "fix" the economy is to allow the "malinvestment" created by the false signals in the economy (from the open market ops and deficit spending) to be liquidated and the resources repurposed into better investments. It...

Adoption Bibliography

Eventually, I will post the rest of my paper, but I think it appropriate to post the Bibliography, and I have some use for having it available online. This represents only the sources used in my paper, not the full extent of sources considered. “Adoption is the Best Option” http://adoptionisthebestoption.yolasite.com/ (a really good example of misleading appeals to emotion.) Alternate Religions Educational Network. Alternate Religions Educational Network (AREN) http://www.aren.org/ . accessed Nov 26, 2009. Babb, L. Anne. Ethics In American Adoption. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey 1999. Baptist Children’s Home and Family Services (BCHFS) http://www.bchfs.com . Accessed Sept 9, 2009. Barrett, William P. “Americas Most (and least) Efficient Charities.” Forbes Nov 2004 Bender, Karen E., & Nina de Gramont, eds.. Choice: True Stories of Birth, Contraception, Infertility, Adoption, Single Parenthood, & Adoption. San Francisco, CA: MacAdam-Cage 2007 Berne, Emma Carlso...

Calling Evil Good and Good Evil: LDS Policy on Unwed Pregnancies

The opinion piece below was written for publication in the Salt Lake Tribune concurrent with the LDS Church's October General Conference. The Trib couldn't fit it in, so it is published here. My vote in the sustaining was communicated to both the First Presidency and my local ward Bishop separately. This weekend, members of the LDS Church will gather in their great and spacious building on North Temple for their semi-annual General Conference. During one of the sessions, members will be asked to raise their hands in sustaining votes for church leaders. I will not be in attendance, so I will use this article as a means of casting my vote in the negative for all of the Church’s General Authorities who promote and support the church’s policy of “encouraging” all unwed mothers to relinquish their babies for adoption. This encouragement comes in the form of extreme pressure from church leaders and devout family and friends. This policy, which the church stops short of saying is...