Skip to main content

Why Democracy doesn't work

Yesterday, I had a conversation with a woman who recognized my name from some political work I did a couple of years ago. The issue concerned the process of drawing political boundaries around school districts, and this woman, a retired school teacher, disagreed with the way the legislature had set up the voting.
When I told her that we'd have to agree to disagree, she slammed her hand onto the table and angrily stormed off, ending the conversation.
I have no quarrel with her passion in standing up for something she believes is unfair; where I have a problem is that she had such a hardened viewpoint that she wasn't even willing to explore the reasoning behind the legislation. In this particular case there was a sound reason why the legislature had decided to limit who could vote in creating a new school district using a particular procedure. (There were two other procedures in the statues, one that required no vote at all and one that allowed everyone to vote.)
In this particular case, the people who were not allowed to vote on the boundary issue had the ability to vote on other issues that the people who did get a vote on the school district boundaries did not, but which impacted them in terms of property taxes.
If the voting had been universal, then the one faction would have been able to force the other to subsidize their policies. Policies that the legislature felt needed to be moderated.
This type of knee-jerk reaction, and an emotional unwillingness to consider both sides of a question are why a democracy can never work. Fortunately, we live in a republic where the legislators do the due dilligence. Unfortunately, they are still dependant on being democratically elected.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Agregate Demand and the US Savings Rate

In my last post, I touched on the differences between the economic theories of John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises. Immediately aftward, I was directed to this story in the New York Times. It seems that americans are saving more instead of spending the their money on consumer goods. Up until this downturn, about 70% of the US Economy was consumer spending, and in 2005, the US Savings rate was negative 2.7%. The "stimulus" is supposed to stimulate spending to get money moving again. But it isn't happening as planned. Folks are saving for down payments because they don't expect to get zero down home mortgages; they're saving to replenish their decimated retirement and college funds. The austrians believe that the best way to "fix" the economy is to allow the "malinvestment" created by the false signals in the economy (from the open market ops and deficit spending) to be liquidated and the resources repurposed into better investments. It...
Post a Comment
Read more

Adoption Bibliography

Eventually, I will post the rest of my paper, but I think it appropriate to post the Bibliography, and I have some use for having it available online. This represents only the sources used in my paper, not the full extent of sources considered. “Adoption is the Best Option” http://adoptionisthebestoption.yolasite.com/ (a really good example of misleading appeals to emotion.) Alternate Religions Educational Network. Alternate Religions Educational Network (AREN) http://www.aren.org/ . accessed Nov 26, 2009. Babb, L. Anne. Ethics In American Adoption. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey 1999. Baptist Children’s Home and Family Services (BCHFS) http://www.bchfs.com . Accessed Sept 9, 2009. Barrett, William P. “Americas Most (and least) Efficient Charities.” Forbes Nov 2004 Bender, Karen E., & Nina de Gramont, eds.. Choice: True Stories of Birth, Contraception, Infertility, Adoption, Single Parenthood, & Adoption. San Francisco, CA: MacAdam-Cage 2007 Berne, Emma Carlso...
3 comments
Read more

Calling Evil Good and Good Evil: LDS Policy on Unwed Pregnancies

The opinion piece below was written for publication in the Salt Lake Tribune concurrent with the LDS Church's October General Conference. The Trib couldn't fit it in, so it is published here. My vote in the sustaining was communicated to both the First Presidency and my local ward Bishop separately. This weekend, members of the LDS Church will gather in their great and spacious building on North Temple for their semi-annual General Conference. During one of the sessions, members will be asked to raise their hands in sustaining votes for church leaders. I will not be in attendance, so I will use this article as a means of casting my vote in the negative for all of the Church’s General Authorities who promote and support the church’s policy of “encouraging” all unwed mothers to relinquish their babies for adoption. This encouragement comes in the form of extreme pressure from church leaders and devout family and friends. This policy, which the church stops short of saying is...
3 comments
Read more