Skip to main content

Keynes vs. Mises -- Whose Theory Will Rule

When I was in high school I was one of those geeky - nerdy kids. This was the late 1970's and calculators were just coming on the market, so I had a Texas Instruments SR-50A in a pouch on my belt and a slide-rule in my shirt pocket. If the PC had existed back then, I would have been a prototypical computer geek. One of my favorite classes was Vocational Electronics.

One day during my Junior year the instructor gave us a lab assignment involving resonant circuits. We were to build a tank circuit with an inductor and a capacitor in parallel, calculate the frequency the circuit should resonate at, then measure the voltage across the circuit as we varied the frequency to see if the formula actually worked.

There were two of us working on the lab. I finished the lab quickly; Mike, well, not so quickly. While I waited for him to finish the assignment, I started experimenting with values of capacitor outside the range from the assignment. As I got farther and farther and farther away from the values in the design of the assignment, the more error there was in the formula. Eventually, the error was so large I had to conclude that the formula didn't work.

As I've gone through the last 30 or so years, I've found many other things that work well with "normal" values, but when those values are pushed to the extremes, the rules don't work. What is true in the middle just isn't true at the periphery.

That is the nature of science... to push the values to the extremes and see where the theory breaks down, where the rules don't work any more, where the "truth" isn't so true any more. Then science's task is to figure out why the rules don't work anymore.

I told this story to set up a point about the current economic situation and the Obama administration's attempts to fix it. The plans to fix the economy are based on a theory by John Maynard Keynes that became popular in the 1940's. Keynes theorized that recessions and depressions are caused by a decline in "agregate demand" and that by pumping money into the economy that demand could be stimulated.

For the last 70 years, every time the economy has started to contract, the Federal Reserve has lowered interest rates and the government has increased spending. Keynes' theory seems to work, but this contraction has some different features to it. Interest rates were already low, and are now essentially zero, the deficit is higher than ever before. Will the Keynesian bailout/stimulus work?

It doesn't get a lot press, but there is another theory, proposed by the austrian economist Ludwig von Mises in 1924 that says both the boom (bubble) and the bust are caused by intervention by the government. Under this theory, the Fed's open market operations and the government's deficit spending send false signals in the economy, which cause faulty investments that appear as a bubble, then collapse when the banks, etc., realize that the resourses aren't really there. If this theory is correct, then the government has been building a large bubble (and patching the sides of it when it has tried to collapse) since the great depression. Evenutally, the bubble will become so large that lowering interest rates will no longer "stimulate" and deficit spending will only cause the value of the dollar to tank and massive price inflation.

So, are we in that area where the rules don't work anymore for Lord Keynes theory? We'll have to wait and see.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Agregate Demand and the US Savings Rate

In my last post, I touched on the differences between the economic theories of John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises. Immediately aftward, I was directed to this story in the New York Times. It seems that americans are saving more instead of spending the their money on consumer goods. Up until this downturn, about 70% of the US Economy was consumer spending, and in 2005, the US Savings rate was negative 2.7%. The "stimulus" is supposed to stimulate spending to get money moving again. But it isn't happening as planned. Folks are saving for down payments because they don't expect to get zero down home mortgages; they're saving to replenish their decimated retirement and college funds. The austrians believe that the best way to "fix" the economy is to allow the "malinvestment" created by the false signals in the economy (from the open market ops and deficit spending) to be liquidated and the resources repurposed into better investments. It...

Haiti Adoption Story

Most of us have seen or read stories of adoptions of Haitian children following the earthquake last month. Some of the stories have had a positive slant (the charity has saved children...) other's have had a negative slant (the "missionaries" who kidnapped and tried to smuggle 33 children across the border into the Dominican Republic). At a family gathering yesterday, my wife heard a story about a couple that was "finally" able to adopt a child they've been trying to adopt for about 4 years. As the story was related to me, this couple had originally been matched with this child about 4 years ago, but the adoption was cancelled when the parents of the child took her back and parented her themselves. After about three years of caring for the child, the natural parents returned her to the orphanage because both of them had been diagnosed with tuberculosis; a death sentence in Haiti. (Mortality for untreated TB is about 67%.) The adoption was finalized just befo...

Conventional Wisdom Meets Reality:
There Ought Not to be a Law

The "before" picture of an intersection near Bristol, England: Maximum traffic of 1700 cars per hour and about 300 pedestrians. Commute time for some people using the intersection over 20 minutes in rush hour traffic. The "after" picture: Traffic flow increased to 2000 cars per hour, and still handles the 300 pedestrians. Commute time reduced to just 5 minutes. In the eight months since the change, there have only been two minor incidents, and not a single person (motorist or pedestrian) has been injured in an accident. How did they do it? What new technology did they use to effect this miraculous change? They took out the traffic conrol signals! Yes, you read that right, the traffic lights were removed. By removing all of the red, yellow and green lights, the motorists became more courteous, more cautious, and more sharing of the road way. In complete defiance of the conventional wisdom. This experiment raises a lot of very interesting questions. First, do our pre...